Rock The Bells (2006): Case Studies In Social Storytelling
Posted By John Lyons Murphy / 23rd December 2011
Rock The Bells is a documentary made by AboutFace directors Denis Henry Hennelly and Casey Suchan summarized on IMDB as “An inside look at what it took to bring the Wu-Tang Clan together for their final performance at the Rock the Bells Hip-Hop festival.” The film premiered at the 2006 Tribeca Film Festival, played the Chicago International Film Festival as well as Slamdance and hit theaters in 2007. You can find it on DVD on Netflix or at your local video store (if there is still a local video where you live).
But that’s all results of making the movie. We’ve got Denis and Casey here, and we’re going to talk more about making the movie and the story behind the story on screen. (Full disclosure: I was an executive producer on Rock The Bells, but that doesn’t mean when I say RTB is an excellent film that I’m exaggerating. It is an excellent film.)
John: How did you get this project going, how did it come about?
Casey: Denis and I had been producing hip hop documentaries for a few years at QD3 Entertainment. In 2004, we went out on our own to start doing projects where we could see
our vision all the way through. We read an article in the LA Weekly about the upcoming Rock The Bells hip hop festival, and it said that the Wu Tang Clan was going to be there – together with a diverse lineup of supporting acts – and we thought it would make an interesting concert DVD. So we met with Chang (the concert’s founder, promoter, and financier). We realized that putting the festival together was a dramatic story worth telling, and Chang and his crew were compelling characters. There was something in their underdog, D.I.Y. risk-everything spirit that encapsulated everything we’d come to appreciate about hip hop culture.
In our initial meeting we agreed to start shooting right away because the concert was only two weeks away. Getting Wu-Tang together seemed impossible; it was something promoters simply didn’t attempt anymore because so many had been burned trying. We shot every meeting. And simultaneously, Denis and I started watching concert docs like Woodstock and Gimme Shelter, thinking about the most compelling way to tell this story. The day of the show we scrambled together a lot of excellent people who were willing to work for what little money we had, and they brought their cameras and shot. Twenty cameras. We shot from 8am that morning to 4am that night. Then the editing began.
John: In the film, Chang and company put up guerrila marketing-style posters on the sides of roads, stuff like that, so the advertising doesn’t feel corporate. Did you do that kind of marketing for the film itself? Do you think that kind of street cred, street team style of marketing works?
Denis: We used street teams and promoted it that way, yeah. It was before the explosion of Facebook. With our subsequent film, Bold Native, we were able to sell out screenings all across America just using Facebook. Our online promotion (with Rock The Bells) in 2006 was limited to discussion groups, fan forums, and chat rooms. Which is fine, but it’s not as effective and immediate as social networking where people can build personal investment in a project.
John: What was your favorite part of the experience?
Denis: My favorite part was the test screenings. When you’re editing a documentary you’re basically writing it in the editing room and you’re trying to find the most engaging and moving path through the story. Test screenings give you the chance to engage with the audience and see what’s working and what’s not, so you have an opportunity to go back in and make it a more effective piece of story-telling. Because once a film is released you don’t have that chance.
Casey: (SPOILER ALERT) My favorite part of this whole process was when we were compelled to change the ending of the story, the licensing issues with Wu Tang music itself. It was this kind of necessary thing where we had to take the music out of the movie, like it or not – at the time it felt devastating. How can we end this movie without the music of
Wu Tang? But we ended up looking at it as a challenge – how can we make the best of this? Now it ends without the musical performance and I think it’s a deeper, stronger film. The film is about more than just this one moment where they’re all on stage together performing. And it goes into this discussion of O.D.B., what was going on with him and their dynamic, because when he’s on stage he’s not really engaged.
Denis: I couldn’t disagree more strenuously. Everything Casey is saying was there with the music. I think taking the music out limited our distribution deal.
Casey: I think that’s true. But I think it’s stronger without the music.
Denis: I disagree.
Casey: That’s why we make a good team!
John: Other than having to deal with me and Barry Poltermann, what was the worst past of the experience?
Casey: Maybe being in San Bernadino in 100-and-some degree weather?
Denis: The fight to get this film to audiences. I know there are people who would love this film who will never see it. There are hip hop fans who go to the Rock The Bells festival and don’t even know that there’s a movie about it. Then they see it and come back to us and say they can’t believe they missed it and it’s been out for a couple of years. It’s hard to reach people.
John: After Rock The Bells, you guys made a narrative film with Bold Native. Did you use any doc-style tactics or aesthetics in BN?
Casey: Docu-style tactics? Yeah, from the producing side. Producing the film, we didn’t try to own spaces. We kept an efficient doc-style crew. We shot in places that were working spaces, like in a restaurant that was actually open at the time. Not a lot of big lighting. And we tried to keep a low profile so actors could lose themselves in the moment.
Denis: From a directing side – I agree with what Casey said. We basically shot the film the same way we would have shot a documentary. The only difference being that we controlled what was happening in front of the camera. We shot in live places. There were things happening around us we couldn’t control. The only way we could afford to do the film was that we had to shoot it like a documentary. And we learned so much about storytelling from documentary filmmaking because you have to take what you’re given and find the story within it. So you have to be very creative in the editing room. And on set you have to have an eye out for those story elements. We’ve brought those skills to our narrative work, our fiction work.
John: What’s next, documentary or narrative?
Casey: We are in production on our next documentary feature, which is about a legal case – USA vs SHACUSA. Six activists were imprisoned for between 1 to 6 years in federal prison for what most Americans would consider free speech activity – running a website, making speeches, organizing protests. It deals with our legal system, animal rights, corporate power, the prison system… and tells the story of six very dedicated, intelligent and compelling individuals.
Denis: A documentary that involves free speech, questions of what is terrorism, and the internet.
Casey: And we’re also developing narrative projects, as well.
John: You guys are machines!
–
Case Studies In Social Storytelling examines past successes and failures in the world of Social Storytelling.















